Introducing Paul…


 The answer to the above question is because I don’t feel I can remain silent.

Let’s consider some of the things that are happening in the world today, both the big picture, as well as a few of the smaller, passing details.  First of all, and this IS the biggest, there’s the fact that we – pretty much all of us – seem to be a sad bunch of some seven billion or so Neros, fiddling about while the globe burns.  And while I don’t suppose I have to say that I’m speaking metaphorically here and that the world isn’t actually burning, it is heating up faster and faster.  Is the cause of global warming activity on the part of human beings?  Yes!  The great majority of respected scientists in the world resoundingly reply in the affirmative to that question.  And those who claim that such changes in climate are merely naturally occurring phenomena fail to take into consideration the fact of how quickly the climate is changing.  Naturally occurring climate change normally takes millennia, if not longer, not decades.

There are, to be fair, some individuals who are sounding the alarm about it, just as there are even a few programs here and there, a couple of items on some people’s agendas, that begin to hint at a start at addressing the problem.  But in terms of the speed and the size of the changes that are taking place on the planet, the enormous challenges to our ways of thinking and of how we actually lead our lives on a daily basis, these efforts feel like we’re fighting a raging forest fire with a garden hose – and one without much pressure at that.  So, there’s at least one good reason why I feel as though I have to speak out.

In addition, there’s a whole slue of other topics that intrigue, fascinate, captivate, enchant, engage, engross, pique, arouse, annoy, miff, rile, exasperate, or just plain preoccupy my thoughts, things for example having to do with politics and world affairs, art, religion and spirituality, popular culture, economics, science, history, education, language, and lots of other subjects that come up on a daily basis.

I will eventually go on to talk about any number of them, but the more I think about it, the more I begin to wonder if there isn’t also some funny, fuzzy connection that links all of these things together, maybe in a subliminal sort of way. At least in my mind.  I wonder if what connects this string of otherwise disparate items might be a tendency on the part of many of us to refuse to put in the hard work that it takes into discovering answers for ourselves.  It takes time, and thought, and reading, and analysis of events, and a willingness to look the truth in the eye, even if it takes you to an uncomfortable place.  And the process most definitely does not rely on a sacred book written a few thousand years ago, for example, no matter how revered, to tell us how we ought to lead our lives today.

Instead, if we make mistakes, let them be our own mistakes.  If we misconstrue, miscalculate, misunderstand, or otherwise mess up, let the onus be on ourselves.  In the case of this blog, let the responsibility be mine for what I write.  But in doing so, in attempting to make sense of the complexities of the world of the twenty-first century, at least let it be said that I took the time and did my best to find answers that make some logical sense.  Personally, I can’t think of a better use of my time, or a better aspiration for any human being, than to search for the truth to the best of one’s ability, and then to speak that truth fearlessly.  At any rate, it’s definitely better than endlessly watching TV, or shopping for the latest gadget or accessory, or listening to some preacher tell you what he thinks his God tells you’re supposed to think or do.

So, this is why I decided to join my old, liberal friend, Kevin, in starting this blog.  You may not agree with me, or with us, and you may not like what either of us says or espouses, and if you don’t, you should say so. But at least it’s my hope that whatever I write will be as truthful as I know how express it.  And in the end, I can at least make this promise, that whatever I write, it will always come from the heart, not just from the head.

So, thank you for reading this, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts, too, on these topics, or on any others that pertain.

Paul (one of the two old liberals)



I suppose I ought to say upfront that I have my convictions – some might say my prejudices.  Otherwise, I wouldn’t be writing here in the first place.  And what follows from convictions are choices – specifically, choices in regard to how we act.

At least for the most part, people have the right to choose.  Let’s not get crazy about it, of course.  You don’t have the right to choose to bang your neighbor’s door down, even if his barking dogs are really, really annoying (yes, I AM talking about my actual neighbor here!), and you can’t choose to yell fire in a crowded theater etc.  These are, of course, the obvious cases.  But beyond the self-evident ones that pretty much everybody would agree on, where do we draw the line?

That seems to be at the crux of so much of our politics lately.  For example, I’m gay and have been in an amazingly happy relationship with the same man for thirty-two years now.  What follows, logically enough at least to my way of thinking, is that my partner and I ought to have the right to choose whether or not we want to marry each other.  I’m not talking about a church wedding.  That’s probably the last place on earth either of us would want to get married anyway.  No, let the churches, with all their rules and their bigotry, choose NOT to marry gay people.  Fine I say!  But marriage is a legal contract.  A LEGAL contract!  From that point of view, it’s not all that different from a license (a sanctioning by the state) to start up a business.  In this case, it’s a legally binding agreement between two people to spend and share their lives together, and it ought to be as open to two men, or two women, as it is to a man and a woman.  This makes perfect sense to me, and it solves everybody’s problem, right?  Churches can continue to discriminate against gay people in this regard, if that makes them happy, and gay people can still have the legal document that affords them the rights and privileges of the married state.   No harm, no fowl, as far as I can see.

The same thing goes for abortion.  To be honest, I don’t know what I would do if I were a woman and experienced an unwanted pregnancy.  I’m not sure, in fact, if ANY man can really put himself in the position of a woman who is in that position.  Do I believe that fetuses are living human beings?  I have to admit that I am not sure.  And I have to think that none of us can be really sure.  How could anyone be, one way or the other?  Therefore, the whole thrust of the argument has to fall on the side of allowing a woman to choose what SHE thinks, when and if she is in that circumstance.  And it not up to society, or to our legal representatives, or to some priest’s or some preacher’s interpretation of God’s will, to make laws that dictate how a woman ought to act when it comes to such deeply personal matters.   For each woman, it’s her body, and therefore her decision, as far as I can see.

Now, a lot of the current Republican contenders for their party’s presidential nomination seem to want to take these choices away from us.  They think that the teachings of their particular church ought to become the law of the land, even though not even every church agrees with their church.  So, whose church gets to be the best of churches?  Which one gets to boss the rest of us around and tell us how to live our lives?

Let’s hope that Mitt Romney, or Rick Santorum, or Newt Gingrich never gets to be president of the United States, because if one of them does, you’d better prepare yourself to toe the line.  They’ll have no problem giving you the answer to the above question about who gets to choose.  Unfortunately, a lot of us may not like either the answers they give, or the consequences to us that follow from their choices.


3 thoughts on “Introducing Paul…

  1. Dear Paul,

    thank you for including me! I am looking forward to follow your dialogues, your comments and thoughts. I couldn’t agree more on your thoughts expressed in your Introduction. We live in a political circus atmosphere aided by an uncritical or captured press/media. Luckily we have some real alternative sources on the internet. Luckily we see signs that alternative political action groups are forming. I believe we are at the beginning of a different political life, a kind of revolution, that challenges the money driven political institutions, just as we see beginnings of a scientific and technical revolution. Anyway, that is my take on things.Have you read the book The Drunkard’s Walk. How Randomness rules Our Lives, by Leonard Mlodinow. It gives you reason to loose some of your pessimism, at least it had that effect on me.
    All the best,

  2. Hello you two! Haven’t read all of the Introductions yet, but how great that the two of you are doing this! Martin and I are looking forward to reading and commenting. Love and hugs, Jeff.

  3. This is a great idea. I’m looking forward to more commentary and comments. I for one belive global warming is all too real from personal experience. Here in Garrett County Maryland the winters since 2009 have been bizarre. 2009-10 = 262″ of snow (yes, thats over 21′), 2010-11 = extreme cold and 2011-12 = oddest yet, severe blizzards followed by 50 degree melt downs starting the very next day. This yo-yo trend is downright weird and alarming. It’s a daunting challenge to know what to do about it but let’s not vote for the ostrichs who deny its reality. All my love to you both. Sheila (Paul’s sister)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s